The People Who Count Your Vote Do Not Work in Washington
A federal elections board lost all its members this week. The woman who runs the election in your county did not, and she is the one who actually counts the ballots. Here is what the numbers say about the people at the folding table.
National election administration score, MIT Elections Performance Index
The woman with the keys
Picture a town clerk in a small office off the main street, the kind of room with a flag in the corner and a coffee maker that has seen better decades. Sometime this fall she will unlock a church basement or a school gym before dawn, set up the folding tables, test the machine, and check in the first voter of the day by name. She has done it for years. She will do it again in November whether or not anyone in Washington keeps their job.
I thought about her this week, because in Washington a lot of people did not keep their jobs. On Thursday, July 9, the White House removed the last members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, the small federal board that had been down to a handful of commissioners and is now down to none (Votebeat, July 9, 2026). The headlines were loud. A federal elections agency, gutted, months before the midterms. It is a real story, and my colleagues covered the Washington end of it plainly. But if you are the voter wondering whether your ballot still gets counted, the honest answer starts nowhere near Washington. It starts with the clerk and her keys.
Ten thousand small offices
Here is the fact that reframes the whole week. American elections are not run from one building in the capital. They are run from roughly 10,000 local election jurisdictions scattered across the country, from big county boards with hundreds of staff down to township clerks who do the job part time (Congressional Research Service, The Election Administration and Voting Survey, 2026). That federal commission never counted a single ballot. It writes voluntary standards, tests voting equipment, keeps the national mail registration form current, and sends federal grant money to the states (U.S. Election Assistance Commission, About the EAC). Useful work. Not the count.
The count belongs to the clerk. And when I say the system is decentralized, I am not describing a weakness. I am describing ten thousand sets of hands, most of them local, most of them people you could find in the phone book, each responsible for a piece small enough to see all the way around. Wisconsin runs its elections through more than 1,800 municipal clerks, one of the most spread-out systems in the country (Wisconsin Elections Commission, 2024). In 2024 that state counted a presidential race decided by less than a single point, and it canvassed and certified the result without a documented tabulation failure (official returns, 2024; Verified Voting). Eighteen hundred small offices, one razor-thin margin, and it held.
What the machinery did the last time it mattered
I like numbers that have already been tested, because a promise is cheap and a receipt is not. So here is the receipt from the last big election. In 2024 the country counted more than 158 million ballots at about 65 percent turnout, tallied across those thousands of local jurisdictions and documented in the federal government's own survey (U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 2024 Election Administration and Voting Survey, 2025). No systemic breakdown in the count. Just a very large job, done mostly by local people, finished.
And it is not a one-year fluke. There is a scorecard for this, built by researchers at the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, that grades every state on 19 nuts-and-bolts measures of how well it runs elections. The national average on that index climbed from about 63 percent in 2008 to 80 percent in the 2024 edition (MIT Elections Performance Index, 2026). The lines got shorter, too. The share of Election Day voters who waited more than half an hour fell from 14 percent in 2020 to 11 percent in 2024, and it fell even as more people went back to voting in person (MIT Survey of the Performance of American Elections, 2025). That is the clerk, and ten thousand like her, quietly getting better at the job while the country argued about them.
Neither party owns the folding table
The part I wish more people knew is that the clerk is not a partisan. She cannot afford to be. The states that run the cleanest elections are a bipartisan crowd, and that is the surest sign the work is honest.
Look at the top of the pile. Nebraska, deep red, scored 87 percent on that MIT index, the highest of any state under unified Republican governance (MIT Election Lab). Utah, also Republican, mails a ballot to every voter statewide and checks the signatures (Utah Lieutenant Governor's Office). New Mexico and Colorado, both run by Democrats, sit right up there beside them, and Colorado ran the country's first statewide audit that hand-checks paper ballots against the machine count back in 2017 (Verified Voting). Red states and blue states, using different methods, landing in the same honest place. We keep the full list, judged by one ruler for everybody, at states by election administration quality.
New Mexico also settles a myth worth killing. It ranks near the very top for how well it runs elections, and 47th in the country for how many of its people actually turn out, around 55 percent in 2024 (MIT Elections Performance Index, 2026). Running elections well and getting a big crowd to vote are two different things. A good clerk is judged on the first. The second is up to the rest of us. If turnout is what you care about, the map of who shows up is a separate story, and we tell it at states by voter turnout.
What the empty board can and cannot do
I do not want to wave the Washington story away. An elections agency with no members is a genuine gap, and I would be lying to you if I said it was nothing. Until the president nominates and the Senate confirms new commissioners, that board cannot update the national registration form, cannot certify a new voting machine, and cannot formally move some of the federal money the states use (Votebeat, July 9, 2026; Just Security, July 2026). Those things matter over months and years, and it is fair to want them fixed.
But the fear the headline invites, that somebody in Washington just seized the count, does not survive contact with how the count actually works. Nobody in that federal office was ever going to check you in at the gym, feed your ballot into the scanner, or sit through the canvass afterward. That was always the clerk. It still is.
What I would keep an eye on
So here is where I would look, if you want to watch this honestly instead of anxiously. Keep an eye on your own county clerk's office in September, when registration deadlines, ballot printing, and poll worker training all come due, because that is where you will feel it first if anything is actually wrong. Keep an eye on the Senate to see whether it confirms new members for the empty board, since that is the only thing that fills those seats. And keep an eye on the number in November, the plain fact of a national election counted across ten thousand small offices, the way it has been counted before.
The clerk is not following the fight in Washington. She is ordering the pens, double checking the voter rolls, and figuring out who is bringing the coffee. When the polls open, she will be there before you are. That is not a small thing. In a country this big and this loud, it might be the steadiest thing we have.
2024 voter turnout in high-scoring administration states, and one exception
Share of Election Day voters waiting more than 30 minutes
Brooke Scovens writes about politics, power, and what the numbers mean for regular people.
Sources
- Votebeat, Trump fires Election Assistance Commission members, leaving agency unable to act, July 9, 2026 https://www.votebeat.org/national/2026/07/09/trump-fires-election-assistance-commission-members-hicks-hovland-mccormick/
- Just Security, What is the Election Assistance Commission With No Commissioners?, July 2026 https://www.justsecurity.org/146430/election-assistance-commission/
- U.S. Election Assistance Commission, About the EAC https://www.eac.gov/about
- Congressional Research Service, The Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS): Overview and 2024 Findings (IF13056) https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13056
- U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 2024 Election Administration and Voting Survey Report, June 30, 2025 https://www.eac.gov/news/2025/06/30/us-election-assistance-commission-releases-2024-election-administration-and-voting
- MIT Elections Performance Index blog, U.S. Election Administration Remained Strong in 2024 (released April 2026) https://elections-blog.mit.edu/articles/us-election-administration-remained-strong-2024
- Charles Stewart III, How We Voted in 2024, MIT Survey of the Performance of American Elections, 2025 https://electionlab.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2025-07/HowWeVotedIn2024.pdf
- Wisconsin Elections Commission, Voter Turnout Statistics (2024) https://elections.wi.gov/statistics-data/voter-turnout
- Verified Voting, Audit Law Database (post-election and risk-limiting audit requirements by state) https://verifiedvoting.org/auditlaws/
- Utah Lieutenant Governor's Office, Vote by Mail in Utah https://vote.utah.gov/
Parker, T. E. (2026). The People Who Count Your Vote Do Not Work in Washington. US Political Rank. https://uspoliticalrank.com/blog/scovens-the-people-who-count-your-vote<iframe src="https://uspoliticalrank.com/embed/scovens-the-people-who-count-your-vote" width="100%" height="520" style="border:1px solid #ddd;border-radius:8px" title="The People Who Count Your Vote Do Not Work in Washington" loading="lazy"></iframe>Keep reading
The Daily Rank
The paid daily briefing: what moved, who ranks where, and the receipts. Or start with the free weekly digest.
Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time. We never sell your address.